Brand New Confusion
In this post-90’s biotech era which we all inhabit, I’m finding that brand recognition is becoming a confusing game indeed. Old favourite boutique vendors like Molecular Probes have been swallowed up by enormous, multi-tentacled distributors like Invitrogen, and keeping track of who’s distributing your favourite brand of pipettor, or water filter, or tissue culture media, can make for hours of fun and games. Even the big players keep getting bought and sold – just try to sort out the whole Merck/EMD fine chemical business, or the ownership structure of VWR, if you have some time to kill. And I’m still trying to get my head around Thermo Fisher. What does Thermo Electron have to do with distributing pipette tips and latex gloves? How, if at all, is this related to Thermo Finnigan? It makes my head hurt just thinking about it.
And then there’s my personal favourite suite of technologies du jour, loosely grouped into “next-generation”
In the case of Illumina’s almost-works-most-of-the-time Genome Analyzer, most people still call it a “Solexa”. At the recent AGBT conference, which I’ve rattled on about in more detail elsewhere, practically the only people using the term “Illumina Genome Analyzer” were members of the large posse of Illumina employees in attendance. And most people don’t call the ex-454 machine a “Roche” GS-FLX; to most, it’s still a “454”, although this seems to me to be waning a bit under the crushing weight of Roche’s marketing machinery. Remarkably, the 454 Life Sciences website still exists, and is still a much, much better source of information on this NGS system than the Roche website, which is large, messy, and rather full of the 150,000 other things that Roche sells.
On the other hand, Applied Biosystems seems to have triumphed in branding their SOLiD system, and virtually nobody seems to remember that this was developed by Agencourt Personal Genomics and that the chemistry used was, for a time, referred to as the “APG process”, even by AB itself. Now it’s just SOLiD, small “i” and all, and the scientific community in general seems to have accepted that brand. Timing, I suppose, is everything.
Now, if someone could just explain to me why all these darn NGS boxes are blue…
Posted on Saturday, April 12th, 2008 at 1:49 pm Categorized as:General, Suppliers, Web sites You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

April 13th, 2008 at 10:29 pm
Don’t worry about it. It’ll all be Invitrogen soon enough.
But we still won’t be able to obtain Australian FCS… IN AUSTRALIA.
April 16th, 2008 at 4:24 am
Hey, I exist! Can comment and all!
The thing with brand names is that new users are fairly unaware of earlier incarnations. So I’ve taken to calling these things “Roche/454″ and “Illumina/Solexa” but I didn’t realize SOLiD = Agencourt - you’re quite right about timing.
Just like I didn’t realize that I had to be grateful for the elevator to the top floor of my building, tacked on to an older building three years ago. A colleague of mine told me that there are 101 steps otherwise, which he was obliged to take at least four times daily. (This was when I was dithering as to whether I was going to take the stairs or not, and he came up behind me and pressed the elevator button.)
One good thing about not leaving comments on other folks’ blogs is that it gives you more time to post on your *own* blog. That’s meant for all of us; don’t take it personally.
April 26th, 2008 at 10:02 am
Oi! You! Get back to your own blog and post something!
Kidding, kidding…
We most frequently call ours the “Solexa”, by the way.