Everytime I walked down the hallway to the lab, I kept seeing the ad for the new HaloTag system. Well, finally, it got the better of me. At the last vendor show, I spoke with the company sales rep about it. She was helpful and provided me with some literature and one of the plasmids for cloning. Thanks!
If you haven’t heard of this system, the simplistic explanation is this: you make a fusion protein of your gene of interest to an engineered derivative of the hydrolase gene. Now that your protein is tagged, you express it in mammalian cells and then purchase differently labelled ligands to visualize it.
What I’m not sure of… what’s the advantage is to this system?
The ligand covalently binds to the Halotag and comes in many flavors. You’ve got your Biotin ligand, your coumarin ligand, your FITC ligand… Are you getting the picture? You need to buy a different ligand depending on your experiment. Presumably, how they plan on making money.
I was most interested in the immunofluorescence technology. If it was going to save me time and frustration, I was all about changing over. However, after reading a bit more, I didn’t see an advantage over traditional IF. After fixing the cells, you bind the FITC ligand to your fusion protein and visual it with the scope. How is that different than fixing cells and incubating with a FITC/TRITC conjugated antibody?
The bottom line. Either I’m missing the point of this technology or putting any tag on your protein will get you to the same spot. I don’t see what a hydrolase fusion gets you over a myc or flag or HA tag.
If anyone knows of a true advantage to this system or has actually used it, please let me know. Until then, I’ll keep using my HA fusions for my experiments.