Comments on: Qiagen resolution http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/ Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:23:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-bleeding By: hwiegand http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-144 hwiegand Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:03:58 +0000 http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-144 The problem with a longevity grant is that you need to get funding for years and years and years and years. The problem with a longevity grant is that you need to get funding for years and years and years and years.

]]> By: hbogerd http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-143 hbogerd Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:44:46 +0000 http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-143 Imagine the typical longevity grant budget: expert's salary: 100% supplies: none required Imagine the typical longevity grant budget:
expert’s salary: 100%
supplies: none required

]]> By: Anonymous http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-139 Anonymous Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:16:33 +0000 http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-139 Only scientists that actually do benchwork would have problems with the kits! Only scientists that actually do benchwork would have problems with the kits!

]]> By: Anonymous http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-137 Anonymous Fri, 16 Dec 2005 02:34:24 +0000 http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-137 I doubt Gavrilov ever had a problem with Qiagen kits! I doubt Gavrilov ever had a problem with Qiagen kits!

]]> By: Caped Avenger http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-136 Caped Avenger Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:43:26 +0000 http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-136 I am surprised. Savour this moment. I have never before heard of Qiacrap admitting a problem with any of their kits. It - until now - is always the users' fault. I am surprised. Savour this moment. I have never before heard of Qiacrap admitting a problem with any of their kits.

It - until now - is always the users’ fault.

]]> By: Anonymous http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-135 Anonymous Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:20:30 +0000 http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-135 Compensate and replace the kits? You must be joking!! I'm sure there are enough *scientists* out there that still don't know they don't have DNA. Compensate and replace the kits? You must be joking!! I’m sure there are enough *scientists* out there that still don’t know they don’t have DNA.

]]> By: QiaSucks http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-134 QiaSucks Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:53:41 +0000 http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/12/14/156/#comment-134 I doubt they made any attempt to compensate you for the crappy product they sent you. They should reimburse you for all the defective kits they distributed to you (and every other Qiagen user). I doubt they made any attempt to compensate you for the crappy product they sent you. They should reimburse you for all the defective kits they distributed to you (and every other Qiagen user).

]]>