<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: assorted nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Well, we couldn't keep it cold in the machine.  But the purification took about 3 days, so in that time, there was a lot of room to heat up the protein and kill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we couldn&#8217;t keep it cold in the machine.  But the purification took about 3 days, so in that time, there was a lot of room to heat up the protein and kill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caped Avenger</title>
		<link>http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Caped Avenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Cold?  And doing NMR?  Rii-ght.

But yeah, keep it cold during the prep, use omp-/lon- bugs, and if your purification protocol is good enough you shouldn't have a problem.  I always use excess PMSF when doing the bug lysis, but don't add it after that.  One ion exchange and one gel filtration is usually enough to purifiy away from everything, including the vast majority of proteases.  Stuff that gets in after that is likely to be from bacterial contamination of the purified protein.

And I used to work on nuclear pore FG repeats which are notoriously susceptibe to proteolysis, so I think I know whereof I speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cold?  And doing NMR?  Rii-ght.</p>
<p>But yeah, keep it cold during the prep, use omp-/lon- bugs, and if your purification protocol is good enough you shouldn&#8217;t have a problem.  I always use excess PMSF when doing the bug lysis, but don&#8217;t add it after that.  One ion exchange and one gel filtration is usually enough to purifiy away from everything, including the vast majority of proteases.  Stuff that gets in after that is likely to be from bacterial contamination of the purified protein.</p>
<p>And I used to work on nuclear pore FG repeats which are notoriously susceptibe to proteolysis, so I think I know whereof I speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://products.scienceboard.net/index.php/archives/2005/10/13/122/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>It depends on what temperatures you work at.  If you're really anal about keeping all your samples at 4 degrees, a protease inhibitor is probably not of much value.  However if your IP, ChIP, or enzyme activity assay requires steps at room temperature or above then they will slow degredation of your protein.  

I never used them when I was purifying proteins routinely because the volumes I typically worked with were too large and I was doing drug studies with NMR and didn't want to even think about how they may alter the interaction of drugs with my protein.  Just keeping everything cold was sufficient .   When I started doing ChIP assays they became more relevant because we would do many steps out of the cold room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on what temperatures you work at.  If you&#8217;re really anal about keeping all your samples at 4 degrees, a protease inhibitor is probably not of much value.  However if your IP, ChIP, or enzyme activity assay requires steps at room temperature or above then they will slow degredation of your protein.  </p>
<p>I never used them when I was purifying proteins routinely because the volumes I typically worked with were too large and I was doing drug studies with NMR and didn&#8217;t want to even think about how they may alter the interaction of drugs with my protein.  Just keeping everything cold was sufficient .   When I started doing ChIP assays they became more relevant because we would do many steps out of the cold room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
